Review





Similar Products

94
Proteintech cdx2
Cdx2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cdx2/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bethyl cdx2 antibodies
Cdx2 Antibodies, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cdx2 antibodies/product/Bethyl
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdx2 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biogenex anti-cdx2 monoclonal antibody mu392a-uc
Rescue of autophagy inhibition by AA supplementation. Developmental rates ( a ) and developmental results ( b ) following culture with 10 μM CQ treatment from the 4/8-cell stages to the blastocyst stage with/without AA supplementation. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( c ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in panel ‘a,’ were immunostained for <t>Cdx2</t> and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( d ) The graph shows the numbers of DAPI-positive cells counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, CZB vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.007, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0015. ( e ) The graph shows the proportion of Cdx2- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0012. Nanog: CZB vs. CZ + AA + CQ p = 0.0418, CZB + AA vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0286, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0005. ( f ) The proportion of positive/negative cells in each embryo, as shown in ( c ). The cells are classified into four types: Nanog-positive (Nanog + , green), Cdx2-positive (Cdx2 + , red), double positive for Nanog and Cdx2 (Nanog + /Cdx2 + , yellow), and double negative (Nanog-/Cdx2-, gray). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2-/Nanog-: CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0034, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0045. Cdx2 + /Nanog + : CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0035. ( g ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in ( a ), were immunostained for TFAP2C and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( h ) The graph shows the proportion of TFAP2C- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( g ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, TFAP2C: no significant differences were observed . Nanog: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0322. ( i ) Relative fluorescence intensity of Nanog (green) and TFAP2C (red) in embryos shown in ( g ). Calibration was performed using DAPI fluorescence intensity.
Anti Cdx2 Monoclonal Antibody Mu392a Uc, supplied by Biogenex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-cdx2 monoclonal antibody mu392a-uc/product/Biogenex
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-cdx2 monoclonal antibody mu392a-uc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biogenex mouse anti-cdx2 mu392a-uc
Rescue of autophagy inhibition by AA supplementation. Developmental rates ( a ) and developmental results ( b ) following culture with 10 μM CQ treatment from the 4/8-cell stages to the blastocyst stage with/without AA supplementation. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( c ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in panel ‘a,’ were immunostained for <t>Cdx2</t> and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( d ) The graph shows the numbers of DAPI-positive cells counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, CZB vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.007, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0015. ( e ) The graph shows the proportion of Cdx2- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0012. Nanog: CZB vs. CZ + AA + CQ p = 0.0418, CZB + AA vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0286, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0005. ( f ) The proportion of positive/negative cells in each embryo, as shown in ( c ). The cells are classified into four types: Nanog-positive (Nanog + , green), Cdx2-positive (Cdx2 + , red), double positive for Nanog and Cdx2 (Nanog + /Cdx2 + , yellow), and double negative (Nanog-/Cdx2-, gray). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2-/Nanog-: CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0034, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0045. Cdx2 + /Nanog + : CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0035. ( g ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in ( a ), were immunostained for TFAP2C and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( h ) The graph shows the proportion of TFAP2C- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( g ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, TFAP2C: no significant differences were observed . Nanog: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0322. ( i ) Relative fluorescence intensity of Nanog (green) and TFAP2C (red) in embryos shown in ( g ). Calibration was performed using DAPI fluorescence intensity.
Mouse Anti Cdx2 Mu392a Uc, supplied by Biogenex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-cdx2 mu392a-uc/product/Biogenex
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti-cdx2 mu392a-uc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biogenex mouse monoclonal anti-cdx2
Rescue of autophagy inhibition by AA supplementation. Developmental rates ( a ) and developmental results ( b ) following culture with 10 μM CQ treatment from the 4/8-cell stages to the blastocyst stage with/without AA supplementation. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( c ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in panel ‘a,’ were immunostained for <t>Cdx2</t> and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( d ) The graph shows the numbers of DAPI-positive cells counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, CZB vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.007, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0015. ( e ) The graph shows the proportion of Cdx2- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0012. Nanog: CZB vs. CZ + AA + CQ p = 0.0418, CZB + AA vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0286, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0005. ( f ) The proportion of positive/negative cells in each embryo, as shown in ( c ). The cells are classified into four types: Nanog-positive (Nanog + , green), Cdx2-positive (Cdx2 + , red), double positive for Nanog and Cdx2 (Nanog + /Cdx2 + , yellow), and double negative (Nanog-/Cdx2-, gray). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2-/Nanog-: CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0034, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0045. Cdx2 + /Nanog + : CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0035. ( g ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in ( a ), were immunostained for TFAP2C and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( h ) The graph shows the proportion of TFAP2C- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( g ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, TFAP2C: no significant differences were observed . Nanog: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0322. ( i ) Relative fluorescence intensity of Nanog (green) and TFAP2C (red) in embryos shown in ( g ). Calibration was performed using DAPI fluorescence intensity.
Mouse Monoclonal Anti Cdx2, supplied by Biogenex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti-cdx2/product/Biogenex
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal anti-cdx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biogenex monoclonal anti-cdx2
Rescue of autophagy inhibition by AA supplementation. Developmental rates ( a ) and developmental results ( b ) following culture with 10 μM CQ treatment from the 4/8-cell stages to the blastocyst stage with/without AA supplementation. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( c ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in panel ‘a,’ were immunostained for <t>Cdx2</t> and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( d ) The graph shows the numbers of DAPI-positive cells counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, CZB vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.007, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0015. ( e ) The graph shows the proportion of Cdx2- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0012. Nanog: CZB vs. CZ + AA + CQ p = 0.0418, CZB + AA vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0286, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0005. ( f ) The proportion of positive/negative cells in each embryo, as shown in ( c ). The cells are classified into four types: Nanog-positive (Nanog + , green), Cdx2-positive (Cdx2 + , red), double positive for Nanog and Cdx2 (Nanog + /Cdx2 + , yellow), and double negative (Nanog-/Cdx2-, gray). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2-/Nanog-: CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0034, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0045. Cdx2 + /Nanog + : CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0035. ( g ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in ( a ), were immunostained for TFAP2C and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( h ) The graph shows the proportion of TFAP2C- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( g ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, TFAP2C: no significant differences were observed . Nanog: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0322. ( i ) Relative fluorescence intensity of Nanog (green) and TFAP2C (red) in embryos shown in ( g ). Calibration was performed using DAPI fluorescence intensity.
Monoclonal Anti Cdx2, supplied by Biogenex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/monoclonal anti-cdx2/product/Biogenex
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monoclonal anti-cdx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit monoclonal anti- cdx2
Rescue of autophagy inhibition by AA supplementation. Developmental rates ( a ) and developmental results ( b ) following culture with 10 μM CQ treatment from the 4/8-cell stages to the blastocyst stage with/without AA supplementation. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( c ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in panel ‘a,’ were immunostained for <t>Cdx2</t> and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( d ) The graph shows the numbers of DAPI-positive cells counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, CZB vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.007, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0015. ( e ) The graph shows the proportion of Cdx2- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0012. Nanog: CZB vs. CZ + AA + CQ p = 0.0418, CZB + AA vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0286, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0005. ( f ) The proportion of positive/negative cells in each embryo, as shown in ( c ). The cells are classified into four types: Nanog-positive (Nanog + , green), Cdx2-positive (Cdx2 + , red), double positive for Nanog and Cdx2 (Nanog + /Cdx2 + , yellow), and double negative (Nanog-/Cdx2-, gray). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2-/Nanog-: CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0034, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0045. Cdx2 + /Nanog + : CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0035. ( g ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in ( a ), were immunostained for TFAP2C and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( h ) The graph shows the proportion of TFAP2C- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( g ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, TFAP2C: no significant differences were observed . Nanog: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0322. ( i ) Relative fluorescence intensity of Nanog (green) and TFAP2C (red) in embryos shown in ( g ). Calibration was performed using DAPI fluorescence intensity.
Rabbit Monoclonal Anti Cdx2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit monoclonal anti- cdx2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit monoclonal anti- cdx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biogenex mouse anti- cdx2 mu392a- uc
Rescue of autophagy inhibition by AA supplementation. Developmental rates ( a ) and developmental results ( b ) following culture with 10 μM CQ treatment from the 4/8-cell stages to the blastocyst stage with/without AA supplementation. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( c ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in panel ‘a,’ were immunostained for <t>Cdx2</t> and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( d ) The graph shows the numbers of DAPI-positive cells counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, CZB vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.007, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0015. ( e ) The graph shows the proportion of Cdx2- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0012. Nanog: CZB vs. CZ + AA + CQ p = 0.0418, CZB + AA vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0286, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0005. ( f ) The proportion of positive/negative cells in each embryo, as shown in ( c ). The cells are classified into four types: Nanog-positive (Nanog + , green), Cdx2-positive (Cdx2 + , red), double positive for Nanog and Cdx2 (Nanog + /Cdx2 + , yellow), and double negative (Nanog-/Cdx2-, gray). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2-/Nanog-: CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0034, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0045. Cdx2 + /Nanog + : CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0035. ( g ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in ( a ), were immunostained for TFAP2C and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( h ) The graph shows the proportion of TFAP2C- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( g ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, TFAP2C: no significant differences were observed . Nanog: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0322. ( i ) Relative fluorescence intensity of Nanog (green) and TFAP2C (red) in embryos shown in ( g ). Calibration was performed using DAPI fluorescence intensity.
Mouse Anti Cdx2 Mu392a Uc, supplied by Biogenex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti- cdx2 mu392a- uc/product/Biogenex
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti- cdx2 mu392a- uc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biogenex anti-cdx2 antibody mu392a-5uc
Shortening the length of H3K4me3 domains in 2-cell stage NT embryos improves cloning efficiency. (A) Heatmap displays the categories of H3K4me3 domains on promoters in nuclear transfer 2-cell stage embryos (NT 2-C), nuclear transfer 2-cell stage embryos with WDR5-0103 treatment (NT 2-C + WDR5-0103) and natural fertilized 2-cell stage embryos (NF 2-C). H3K4me3 domains classified into four groups: broad domains, medium domains, narrow domains, and control domains. Dashed lines represent classification based on NT 2-C sample. (B) Genome browser view shows H3K4me3 enrichment of NT 2-C, NT 2-C + WDR5-0103 and NF 2-C samples at a random region of chromosome 14. The dashed box displays the genome browser view of H3K4me3 enrichment on Elf5 gene locus. H3K4me3 enrichment calculated as log 2 (H3K4me3 RPKM / input RPKM). (C) Boxplot illustrates the averaged breadth of H3K4me3 domain at all RefSeq gene promoters in NT 2-C, NT 2-C + WDR5-0103, and NF 2-C samples. Data represented as the mean ± SD. Significance analyzed using Student’s t -test (*** P < 0.001). (D) Averaged expression level [log 2 (FPKM + 1)] of 2-C (left panel) and 4-C (right panel) obH3K4me3 genes and all H3K4me3 marked genes in NT 2-C, NT 2-C + WDR5-0103, NF 2-C, NT 4-C, NT 4-C + WDR5-0103 and NF 4-C samples. Significance analyzed by using Student’s t -test (ns: not significant, * P < 0.05, **** P < 0.0001). (E) Bar chart shows the percentage of embryos reaching blastocyst stage for NT (control) and NT + WDR5-0103 (WDR5-0103) samples. Data represented as mean ± SD ( n = 7). Significance analyzed using Student’s t -test (** P < 0.01). (F) Representative images of E4.5 blastocyst of NT (control) and NT + WDR5-0103 (WDR5-0103) samples. (G) Immunostaining of OCT4 and <t>CDX2</t> in control NT E4 blastocysts (control) and NT E4 blastocysts with WDR5-0103 treatment at the 2-cell stage (WDR5-0103). DAPI stains for DNA (blue), OCT4 is visualized in pink and CDX2 is visualized in green. Scale bar: 50 μm. (H) Bar chart shows the percentage of implantation rate of NT (control) and NT + WDR5-0103 (WDR5-0103) samples examined by cesarean section on E19.5. Each dashed line links a parallel experiment of control and WDR5-0103 sample. Data represented as mean ± SD ( n = 7). Significance analyzed using Student’s t -test (* P < 0.05). (I) Bar chart displaying birth rates of NT embryos without WDR5-0103 treatment (control) and with WDR5-0103 treatment at 2-cell stage (WDR5-0103). Birth rates are calculated as the number of fetuses divided by the number of 2-cells transferred to recipients. Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n ≥ 3). Significance was analyzed by using Student’s t -test (ns: not significant).
Anti Cdx2 Antibody Mu392a 5uc, supplied by Biogenex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-cdx2 antibody mu392a-5uc/product/Biogenex
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-cdx2 antibody mu392a-5uc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Rescue of autophagy inhibition by AA supplementation. Developmental rates ( a ) and developmental results ( b ) following culture with 10 μM CQ treatment from the 4/8-cell stages to the blastocyst stage with/without AA supplementation. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( c ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in panel ‘a,’ were immunostained for Cdx2 and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( d ) The graph shows the numbers of DAPI-positive cells counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, CZB vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.007, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0015. ( e ) The graph shows the proportion of Cdx2- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0012. Nanog: CZB vs. CZ + AA + CQ p = 0.0418, CZB + AA vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0286, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0005. ( f ) The proportion of positive/negative cells in each embryo, as shown in ( c ). The cells are classified into four types: Nanog-positive (Nanog + , green), Cdx2-positive (Cdx2 + , red), double positive for Nanog and Cdx2 (Nanog + /Cdx2 + , yellow), and double negative (Nanog-/Cdx2-, gray). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2-/Nanog-: CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0034, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0045. Cdx2 + /Nanog + : CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0035. ( g ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in ( a ), were immunostained for TFAP2C and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( h ) The graph shows the proportion of TFAP2C- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( g ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, TFAP2C: no significant differences were observed . Nanog: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0322. ( i ) Relative fluorescence intensity of Nanog (green) and TFAP2C (red) in embryos shown in ( g ). Calibration was performed using DAPI fluorescence intensity.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Regulation of autophagy and its role in late preimplantation during mouse embryo development

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11359-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Rescue of autophagy inhibition by AA supplementation. Developmental rates ( a ) and developmental results ( b ) following culture with 10 μM CQ treatment from the 4/8-cell stages to the blastocyst stage with/without AA supplementation. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( c ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in panel ‘a,’ were immunostained for Cdx2 and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( d ) The graph shows the numbers of DAPI-positive cells counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, CZB vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.007, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0015. ( e ) The graph shows the proportion of Cdx2- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( c ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0012. Nanog: CZB vs. CZ + AA + CQ p = 0.0418, CZB + AA vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0286, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0005. ( f ) The proportion of positive/negative cells in each embryo, as shown in ( c ). The cells are classified into four types: Nanog-positive (Nanog + , green), Cdx2-positive (Cdx2 + , red), double positive for Nanog and Cdx2 (Nanog + /Cdx2 + , yellow), and double negative (Nanog-/Cdx2-, gray). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, Cdx2-/Nanog-: CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0034, CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0045. Cdx2 + /Nanog + : CZB vs. CZB + CQ p = 0.0035. ( g ) The embryos at the morula stage, cultured with CQ and AA as shown in ( a ), were immunostained for TFAP2C and Nanog, as well as with DAPI. Scale bars represent 50 μm. ( h ) The graph shows the proportion of TFAP2C- and Nanog-positive cells per total cell number counted in the embryos, as shown in ( g ). Tukey–Kramer’s HSD test, TFAP2C: no significant differences were observed . Nanog: CZB + CQ vs. CZB + AA + CQ p = 0.0322. ( i ) Relative fluorescence intensity of Nanog (green) and TFAP2C (red) in embryos shown in ( g ). Calibration was performed using DAPI fluorescence intensity.

Article Snippet: The anti-CDX2 monoclonal antibody( 1:500; BioGenex, San Ramon, CA, USA, MU392A-UC) to detect TE cells, anti-Nanog rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab80892) to detect the ICM cells and anti-TFAP2C(1:500; AP-2γ antibody; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, TX, USA, sc-12762) were the primary antibodies used.

Techniques: Inhibition, Cell Culture, Fluorescence

Shortening the length of H3K4me3 domains in 2-cell stage NT embryos improves cloning efficiency. (A) Heatmap displays the categories of H3K4me3 domains on promoters in nuclear transfer 2-cell stage embryos (NT 2-C), nuclear transfer 2-cell stage embryos with WDR5-0103 treatment (NT 2-C + WDR5-0103) and natural fertilized 2-cell stage embryos (NF 2-C). H3K4me3 domains classified into four groups: broad domains, medium domains, narrow domains, and control domains. Dashed lines represent classification based on NT 2-C sample. (B) Genome browser view shows H3K4me3 enrichment of NT 2-C, NT 2-C + WDR5-0103 and NF 2-C samples at a random region of chromosome 14. The dashed box displays the genome browser view of H3K4me3 enrichment on Elf5 gene locus. H3K4me3 enrichment calculated as log 2 (H3K4me3 RPKM / input RPKM). (C) Boxplot illustrates the averaged breadth of H3K4me3 domain at all RefSeq gene promoters in NT 2-C, NT 2-C + WDR5-0103, and NF 2-C samples. Data represented as the mean ± SD. Significance analyzed using Student’s t -test (*** P < 0.001). (D) Averaged expression level [log 2 (FPKM + 1)] of 2-C (left panel) and 4-C (right panel) obH3K4me3 genes and all H3K4me3 marked genes in NT 2-C, NT 2-C + WDR5-0103, NF 2-C, NT 4-C, NT 4-C + WDR5-0103 and NF 4-C samples. Significance analyzed by using Student’s t -test (ns: not significant, * P < 0.05, **** P < 0.0001). (E) Bar chart shows the percentage of embryos reaching blastocyst stage for NT (control) and NT + WDR5-0103 (WDR5-0103) samples. Data represented as mean ± SD ( n = 7). Significance analyzed using Student’s t -test (** P < 0.01). (F) Representative images of E4.5 blastocyst of NT (control) and NT + WDR5-0103 (WDR5-0103) samples. (G) Immunostaining of OCT4 and CDX2 in control NT E4 blastocysts (control) and NT E4 blastocysts with WDR5-0103 treatment at the 2-cell stage (WDR5-0103). DAPI stains for DNA (blue), OCT4 is visualized in pink and CDX2 is visualized in green. Scale bar: 50 μm. (H) Bar chart shows the percentage of implantation rate of NT (control) and NT + WDR5-0103 (WDR5-0103) samples examined by cesarean section on E19.5. Each dashed line links a parallel experiment of control and WDR5-0103 sample. Data represented as mean ± SD ( n = 7). Significance analyzed using Student’s t -test (* P < 0.05). (I) Bar chart displaying birth rates of NT embryos without WDR5-0103 treatment (control) and with WDR5-0103 treatment at 2-cell stage (WDR5-0103). Birth rates are calculated as the number of fetuses divided by the number of 2-cells transferred to recipients. Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n ≥ 3). Significance was analyzed by using Student’s t -test (ns: not significant).

Journal: Protein & Cell

Article Title: Setd2 overexpression rescues bivalent gene expression during SCNT-mediated ZGA

doi: 10.1093/procel/pwaf010

Figure Lengend Snippet: Shortening the length of H3K4me3 domains in 2-cell stage NT embryos improves cloning efficiency. (A) Heatmap displays the categories of H3K4me3 domains on promoters in nuclear transfer 2-cell stage embryos (NT 2-C), nuclear transfer 2-cell stage embryos with WDR5-0103 treatment (NT 2-C + WDR5-0103) and natural fertilized 2-cell stage embryos (NF 2-C). H3K4me3 domains classified into four groups: broad domains, medium domains, narrow domains, and control domains. Dashed lines represent classification based on NT 2-C sample. (B) Genome browser view shows H3K4me3 enrichment of NT 2-C, NT 2-C + WDR5-0103 and NF 2-C samples at a random region of chromosome 14. The dashed box displays the genome browser view of H3K4me3 enrichment on Elf5 gene locus. H3K4me3 enrichment calculated as log 2 (H3K4me3 RPKM / input RPKM). (C) Boxplot illustrates the averaged breadth of H3K4me3 domain at all RefSeq gene promoters in NT 2-C, NT 2-C + WDR5-0103, and NF 2-C samples. Data represented as the mean ± SD. Significance analyzed using Student’s t -test (*** P < 0.001). (D) Averaged expression level [log 2 (FPKM + 1)] of 2-C (left panel) and 4-C (right panel) obH3K4me3 genes and all H3K4me3 marked genes in NT 2-C, NT 2-C + WDR5-0103, NF 2-C, NT 4-C, NT 4-C + WDR5-0103 and NF 4-C samples. Significance analyzed by using Student’s t -test (ns: not significant, * P < 0.05, **** P < 0.0001). (E) Bar chart shows the percentage of embryos reaching blastocyst stage for NT (control) and NT + WDR5-0103 (WDR5-0103) samples. Data represented as mean ± SD ( n = 7). Significance analyzed using Student’s t -test (** P < 0.01). (F) Representative images of E4.5 blastocyst of NT (control) and NT + WDR5-0103 (WDR5-0103) samples. (G) Immunostaining of OCT4 and CDX2 in control NT E4 blastocysts (control) and NT E4 blastocysts with WDR5-0103 treatment at the 2-cell stage (WDR5-0103). DAPI stains for DNA (blue), OCT4 is visualized in pink and CDX2 is visualized in green. Scale bar: 50 μm. (H) Bar chart shows the percentage of implantation rate of NT (control) and NT + WDR5-0103 (WDR5-0103) samples examined by cesarean section on E19.5. Each dashed line links a parallel experiment of control and WDR5-0103 sample. Data represented as mean ± SD ( n = 7). Significance analyzed using Student’s t -test (* P < 0.05). (I) Bar chart displaying birth rates of NT embryos without WDR5-0103 treatment (control) and with WDR5-0103 treatment at 2-cell stage (WDR5-0103). Birth rates are calculated as the number of fetuses divided by the number of 2-cells transferred to recipients. Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n ≥ 3). Significance was analyzed by using Student’s t -test (ns: not significant).

Article Snippet: For immunostaining for OCT4, CDX2, and SETD2, anti-Oct4 antibody (Abcam ab181557), anti-CDX2 antibody (BioGenex MU392A-5UC), and SETD2 polyclonal antibody (ABclonal, A3194) were used in this study.

Techniques: Cloning, Control, Expressing, Immunostaining